The Lindisfarne Centre for the Study of Christian Persecution blog image - Iran shows what full Hezbollah control would mean for Lebanese Christians
Iran shows what full Hezbollah control would mean for Lebanese Christians
1 October 2024

 

At the end of April the Lindisfarne Centre warned that open war between Hezbollah and Israel would be a catastrophe for Lebanon’s Christian population. 

 

The country has by far the highest percentage of Christians of any country in the Middle East. It has also been a safe haven  - and because it is a non-Islamic country – often the only safe haven, for Christians fleeing persecution elsewhere in the Middle East, including large numbers who fled Islamic State in Iraq and Syria.

 

Iran and Hezbollah

Lebanon has always been a delicate balance between Christians, Sunni and Shi’a Muslims and a small Druze minority. The balance has been kept by the constitution decreeing that the president must be a Christian, the Prime Minister a Sunni Muslim and the Speaker a Shi’a Muslim. However, in the 1970s the inability of the government to rein in the Palestinian Liberation Organisation (PLO), which controlled Palestinian refugee camps and used them to launch attacks on Israel – led to various groups starting to take matters into their own hands. The result was a 15 year civil war during which Israel responded to PLO attacks by invading and occupying southern Lebanon between 1982-85.

 

While this was happening the 1979 Iranian revolution led to the world’s first radical Islamist state, which aimed to spread the revolution worldwide. Iran’s new constitution gave the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps the duty of both ‘safeguarding’ the revolution at home and spreading it overseas. Within three years it had set up Hezbollah in Lebanon as a jihadist group fighting Isreal, but at the same seeking to create the same radical Islamist state that had been formed in Iran.

 

Hezbollah claimed the credit for Israel’s withdrawal from Lebanon in 1985. It then began it transform itself into what was in effect a political party, issuing an open letter in 1985 which set out the public version of its aims. It’s worth reading this document, because even though it has clearly been somewhat sanitised for public consumption, what it actually says is

 

We obey the orders of one leader, wise and just, that of our tutor and jurist..[Ayatollah] Khomeini.”

 

Our behaviour is dictated to us by legal principles laid down by..the leading jurist [i.e. the Iranian supreme Islamic leader – the Ayatollah Khomeini].

 

In other words, whatever the Iranian Supreme Islamic ruler says is shari’a – should be enforced.

 

Allah has also made it intolerable for Muslims to participate in an unjust regime, unjust for you and for us, in a regime which is not predicated upon the prescriptions of religion and upon the basis of the Law (the Shari’a) as laid down by Muhammad,”

 

i.e. we cannot live under any form of government and law except Islamic government and shari’a.

 

We call upon you to embrace Islam so that you can be happy in this world and the next. If you refuse to adhere to Islam, maintain your ties with the Muslims and don't take part in any activity against them.”

 

The latter is based on “the Constitution of Medina”, which according to early Islamic sources Muhammad agreed in 622 with when he became ruler of Medina. The Medinan Jewish tribes were allowed to practice their religion but there was a catch – they were subservient to the Muslims and had to support them in war (jihad) with non-Muslims. However, over the next five years not only were the various Jewish tribes expelled from their homes, but the men of the last remaining tribe were executed and the women and children enslaved after they were accused for failing to adequately support the Muslims in a battle with pagans.

 

The constitution of Medina is part of the basis for the Islamic concept of dhimmitude – by which Christians are permitted to live under Islamic government, but without any actual rights as citizens. That is the implication here…

 

Christians in Iran

In other words, Hezbollah’s objectives – are for Lebanon to become like Iran.

 

So, it worth looking at what happened to Christians in Iran after the 1979 Islamic revolution. In essence they were treated as dhimmis, historic Christian communities were allowed to worship subject to state surveillance, but any who sought to meet in homes were arrested or sometimes killed, with a number of extra-judicial assassinations of Christian leaders. Publishing the Bible in Persian was banned and the Iranian Bible Society closed down in 1990. Today significant numbers of Christians are arrested and imprisoned on vaguely worded charges.

 

Iran’s attack on Isreal

Yesterday, Israel began what it described as “limited, localised and targeted” raids against Hezbollah inside Lebanon, while Iran launched around 180 missiles towards Iran.

 

Whether Hezbollah emerges from this war strengthened or weakened is likely to affect the future of Christians in Lebanon.

 

Please pray for the future of Lebanon and its Christian population

The Lindisfarne Centre for the Study of Christian Persecution blog image - There is currently no clear path to a more free Iran
Persecution of Christians is likely to get worse in the short term
28 February 2026
The Lindisfarne Centre for the Study of Christian Persecution blog image - Lebanon on the brink
9 September 2025
The Lindisfarne Centre for the Study of Christian Persecution blog image - HTP Podcast on Syria
20 March 2025
The Lindisfarne Centre for the Study of Christian Persecution blog image - APPEAL JULY 2024
18 July 2024
The Lindisfarne Centre for the Study of Christian Persecution blog image - What the Iran-Israel conflict means for Christians
A war would have potentially devastating consequences for Christian minorities in the Middle East
25 April 2024
The Lindisfarne Centre for the Study of Christian Persecution blog image - The UK’s new definition of extremism risks empowering repressive regimes which deny religious liberty and free speech: How to improve it!
Countries such as Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan use vaguely worded extremism laws to arrest and imprison Christians
28 March 2024
The Lindisfarne Centre for the Study of Christian Persecution blog image - Lindisfarne coronation special
Defending faith: king, country and freedom of religion
3 May 2023
The Lindisfarne Centre for the Study of Christian Persecution blog image - Lindisfarne Centre article in the Critic
Nigeria’s climate of terror
Militant religion, not just climate change, is fuelling violence in Nigeria
2 May 2023
The Lindisfarne Centre for the Study of Christian Persecution blog image - FoRB in Qatar
8 December 2022
The Lindisfarne Centre for the Study of Christian Persecution blog image - Why has freedom of religion for Christians dropped off the West’s cultural agenda?
The UN and secular human rights NGOs not reporting on freedom of religion issues for Christian minorities
2 December 2022
The Lindisfarne Centre for the Study of Christian Persecution blog image - Research Ethics
Our policy and why it matters
7 November 2022
…they destroyed the churches and the monasteries far and wide with fire and sword, leaving nothing remaining save bare unroofed walls; and so thoroughly did they do their work that even our own present generation can seldom discover in those places any conclusive memorial of their ancient dignity, sometimes none.
Simeon of Durham, early 12th century historian on the Viking invasion 867AD which eradicated Christianity in parts of England